Pot Smoking Hippies

February 27th, 2008 1 Comment

William F. Buckley died Wednesday, apparently of emphysema related causes. Almost simulataneously, the atheist liberals who Digg found a 3 and a half year old article written by William F. Buckley on the decriminalization of marijuana.

As I understand it, the original 13 states first banned marijuana because it conflicted with the highly profitable tobacco industry. California was the next state to create criminalization of marijuana to deal with the Mexican immigrants after the Mexican Revolution of 1910.

Since then, we’ve had prohibition and mass produced automobiles, which lead to an increase in American deaths. These deaths turned into an opportunity to study how much alcohol it takes to affect brain function enough to impair driving.This, in turn lead to 0.08% BAC laws, minimum legal drinking age laws, and zero tolerance laws for drivers younger than 21 years old in all states. Alcohol is now regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Alcohol content is clearly marked, labled, and taxed on each container.

Part of the problem of the decriminalization of marijuana is measuring how much of the most active cannabinoids it takes to impare judgements. Three and a half years ago, Mr. Buckley reported that “an estimated 100 million Americans have smoked marijuana at least once.” Before marijuana can possibly leave its Federal Prohibition, the government needs to make sure that those under the influence do not infringe on my personal liberty of not getting into an accident or losing my life to someone who is behind the wheel of a car and under the influence of marijuana.

Sure, there are all sorts of reasons sited for the federal decriminalization of marijuana: increased tax revenue, fewer people in the pokey, and fewer people getting a cap in the ass when a drug deal goes bad. But there won’t be a federal decriminalization until someone has the balls to introduce a bill to the House to study how much active cannabinoids it takes to impare judgement. Once that happens, someone will have to create a handy test for determining how much active cannabinoids are in a “dose” of marijuana. The House will then need to figure out how much to tax a plant and sell plant stamps (the states will quickly follow, getting their tax revenues). Next, the House will need to figure out how much to tax each ounce, either by weight or by THC content, and create a new wing of the ATF. What is now a $60 buy will turn into a $80 buy with the increased taxes, but it will drop $20 because supply will increase. The federal bureaucracy to complete any of these changes will take years just to get going.

Of course, if the Free State Project were really serious, they would have some of their guys drafting federal legislation for when they’ve taken over New Hampshire and send a representative to Congress. If NORML were really serious, they would draft legislation for the decriminalization and bring it to a National Issue. Right now, people are fainting over Obama, crying over Hillary, cursing at McCain, but how many people are talking—not writing—about the issue of decriminalization? Do we have anyone in Congress who will put this on the table? The last link claims that “despite extensive educational efforts and millions poured into various legislative campaigns, it’s consistently been shown in opinion polls and at the voting booth that only between a third to 46 percent of Americans endorse legalizing the personal use of cannabis for adults.”

Shoud marijuana use and personal cultivation be legal in the United States? Is it worth the federal bureaucracy? I don’t have a clue. What do you think?

Popularity: 30% [?]

This post was tagged with , , , , , , , , , .

Related posts

Right now, on Pelosi’s website, she is proclaiming to the world that there is 5 days, 8 hours, and 36 minutes until the “first minimum wage increase in 10 years.” Right now, the Federal Minimum Wage is $5.15. The only people really making minimum wage are teenagers working at Burger King and food servers, but their paychecks pay all the taxes from their tips. Great, Ms. Pelosi. Where will the extra money come from to pay the burger slingers? From the consumers who buy. It sure as hell isn’t going to come out of the owner’s pocket. The establishment isn’t going to pay the power company less.

“I can’t pay you your full bill this month because I need to pay my employees more.” Right.

“We’ll shut off your power so you can’t make any money this month.” Then, there’s no power taxes collected, no federal wage taxes withheld, state wage taxes withheld, no social security taxes withheld,no sales taxes collected, no telephone taxes collected, no taxes from the carbon dioxide company, no grease company service taxes, no taxes collected during the transportation of the raw meat, vegetables, buns, soda syrup, and no sewer taxes collected.

So the money that will pay for the wage increase will come from the consumers. You and me. Us. Rates for goods and services will follow a minimum rate increase. Because of this, buying power decreases after a minimum wage adjustment. Check to see if McDonald’s Double Cheeseburger remains on the dollar menu in a month. After the minimum wage increases, and rates increase so the owner keeps making the same, so our buying power decreases.

Imagine the minimum wage earners. They’re now making more, but they have more tax dollars withheld. They can’t buy as much, so they go hungry. They can’t apply for food stamps, because now they’re making too much.

The whole thing is an evil hippie conspiracy to keep people down. However, 39 states have minimum wages higher than Federal, so increasing the minimum wage does little across the board. However, the increases keep coming, and my dollar keeps shrinking.

Great, Nancy! BLOW IT OUT YOUR PIE HOLE!

Blogged with Flock

Tags: , ,

Popularity: 30% [?]

This post was tagged with , , , , , .

Related posts

Since the beginning of time, there has been conflict in the Middle East. Nancy Pelosi thinks that she can single-handedly end all the trouble. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, that if only Syria would renounce terrorism, Pelosi will end all the troubles and strife in the Middle East.

I guess that Syrian President Bashar Assad will actually be taken at his word by Pelosi and her delegation.

“Please, evil Syrian President Bashar Assad,” she will beg, “Please stop terrorism.”

Assad will reply, “I do not condone the ‘terrorism’ of which you speak.” Pelosi will stand up and leave. The terrorism will continue.

Realistically, the only way that we will ever have peace in the Middle East is to wipe everyone off the face of the Earth who values blowing up their children in an effort to kill others more than they value life itself.

Popularity: 18% [?]

This post was tagged with .

Related posts