Blog It Out Your Pie Hole

In The Daily Breeze, Geraldine Ferraro is quoted as saying

“I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama’s campaign - to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against. For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on her. It’s been a very sexist media. Some just don’t like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign. If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”

I see a list of no less than 26 female US presidential candidates and six black presidential candidates for Major or semi-major political parties. Why is Geraldine getting her panties in a bunch over the race or gender of a candidate? Aren’t liberals supposed to toe the line and all overlook gender and racial differences? It makes me think that everything else that comes out of her mouth is questionable. Especially since she didn’t say “If Obama were a white man.”

On the one hand, the Democratic party is the party of emotions, feelings, wants, desires, where everyone wants everyone to be equally poor and equally under the control of the government, except the Mustapha Mond of the Democratic party. No, not Capitan Planet. George Soros.

Popularity: 67% [?]

This post was tagged with algore, black presidential candidates, democratic party, feeling, flip wilson, george soros, geraldine, geraldine ferraro, hippies, liberals, mustapha mond, obama, panties in a bunch.

Related posts

• United Church of Piehole (0)
• Trinity United Church of Christ (1)
• How to be a good Democrat (0)
• Wang-Holder (0)
• Vote, Vote, Vote (1)

Right now, on Pelosi’s website, she is proclaiming to the world that there is 5 days, 8 hours, and 36 minutes until the “first minimum wage increase in 10 years.” Right now, the Federal Minimum Wage is $5.15. The only people really making minimum wage are teenagers working at Burger King and food servers, but their paychecks pay all the taxes from their tips. Great, Ms. Pelosi. Where will the extra money come from to pay the burger slingers? From the consumers who buy. It sure as hell isn’t going to come out of the owner’s pocket. The establishment isn’t going to pay the power company less.

“I can’t pay you your full bill this month because I need to pay my employees more.” Right.

“We’ll shut off your power so you can’t make any money this month.” Then, there’s no power taxes collected, no federal wage taxes withheld, state wage taxes withheld, no social security taxes withheld,no sales taxes collected, no telephone taxes collected, no taxes from the carbon dioxide company, no grease company service taxes, no taxes collected during the transportation of the raw meat, vegetables, buns, soda syrup, and no sewer taxes collected.

So the money that will pay for the wage increase will come from the consumers. You and me. Us. Rates for goods and services will follow a minimum rate increase. Because of this, buying power decreases after a minimum wage adjustment. Check to see if McDonald’s Double Cheeseburger remains on the dollar menu in a month. After the minimum wage increases, and rates increase so the owner keeps making the same, so our buying power decreases.

Imagine the minimum wage earners. They’re now making more, but they have more tax dollars withheld. They can’t buy as much, so they go hungry. They can’t apply for food stamps, because now they’re making too much.

The whole thing is an evil hippie conspiracy to keep people down. However, 39 states have minimum wages higher than Federal, so increasing the minimum wage does little across the board. However, the increases keep coming, and my dollar keeps shrinking.

Great, Nancy! BLOW IT OUT YOUR PIE HOLE!

Blogged with Flock

Tags: hippie, conspiracy, pelosi

Popularity: 46% [?]

This post was tagged with car, conspiracy, hippies, money, Pelosi, pie hole.

Related posts

• Here comes $100 oil, and $3 gasoline? (0)
• A Story (1)
• A Clue? (0)
• Wang-Holder (0)
• The Problem with Blogging (0)

Since the beginning of time, there has been conflict in the Middle East. Nancy Pelosi thinks that she can single-handedly end all the trouble. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, that if only Syria would renounce terrorism, Pelosi will end all the troubles and strife in the Middle East.

I guess that Syrian President Bashar Assad will actually be taken at his word by Pelosi and her delegation.

“Please, evil Syrian President Bashar Assad,” she will beg, “Please stop terrorism.”

Assad will reply, “I do not condone the ‘terrorism’ of which you speak.” Pelosi will stand up and leave. The terrorism will continue.

Realistically, the only way that we will ever have peace in the Middle East is to wipe everyone off the face of the Earth who values blowing up their children in an effort to kill others more than they value life itself.

Popularity: 28% [?]

This post was tagged with Pelosi.

Related posts

• Pot Smoking Hippies (1)
• Pelosi, saving the world from poorness (0)